Flock cameras

Opposed the license plate reader cameras, arguing for-profit vendors and outside agencies control the data with no enforceable local limits, and asked the council to remove them.

Criticized a proposed change that would shift an appointment function away from an elected official, calling it a power grab, and defended Flock cameras while criticizing opponents as affiliated with No Kings and anti-ICE protests.

Asked the town to end the Flock contract, remove the cameras, ban ALPR technology going forward, and irreversibly destroy existing surveillance data.

Defended Flock cameras as a proven crime-fighting tool with minimal misuse, and criticized the council for raising taxes while rejecting the mayor's zero-tax-increase proposal that included more police officers.

Speaking for her husband, a cybersecurity engineer, she called the Flock cameras among the least secure devices he had seen, citing dozens of security flaws, unencrypted data, and data sharing with over a thousand agencies, and urged the town to kill the contract.

Served the council a written notice asserting the Flock cameras violate her constitutional privacy rights and urged immediate discontinuation of the cameras and no further investment.

Said he's encouraged the council agrees Flock isn't the right vendor, warned about mission creep and the 60-day contract notice clause, and argued 'choice' isn't policy — the town needs binding written rules.