Flock ALPR cameras

Opposed Flock, citing the company's data-sharing misrepresentations in other cities and misread-plate incidents endangering families; urged terminating the contract in January.

The 16-year-old argued the cameras enable warrantless tracking in violation of the Fourth Amendment and cited abuse cases and a 71% failure rate in Roseville, CA.

Spoke against the cameras on constitutional grounds, citing data security failures and out-of-state police misuse of plate data.

The 16-year-old Apex Friendship High sophomore urged the council to reject the Flock contract, saying private companies shouldn't restrict residents' rights without accountability.

An ETJ resident since 1984 called the cameras random government surveillance and 'a line that shouldn't be crossed.'

Argued no one asked for the surveillance, it's unnecessary, and it creates legal liability; urged the council to neither renew Flock nor switch to Axon.